Tag: Trump

  • Chris Hedges: The Machinery of Terror

    Chris Hedges: The Machinery of Terror

    Resistance must be collective. We must assert not only our individual rights, but economic, social and political rights — without them we are powerless.

    The Missing Link – by Mr. Fish

    Chris Hedges: The Machinery of Terror

    By Chris Hedges / Original to ScheerPost / January 12, 2026

    I have seen the masked goons who terrorize our streets before. I saw them during the “Dirty War” in Argentina, where 30,000 men, women and children were “disappeared” by the military junta. Victims were held in secret prisons, savagely tortured and murdered. To this day, many families do not know the fate of their loved ones.

    I saw them in El Salvador, when death squads were killing 800 people a month. I saw them in Guatemala under the dictatorship of José Efraín Ríos Montt. I saw them in Augusto Pinochet’s Chile and in Saddam Hussein’s Iraq. I saw them in Iran under the rule of the ayatollahs where I was arrested and jailed twice and once deported in handcuffs. I saw them in Hafez al-Assad’s Syria. I saw them in Bosnia, where Muslims were herded into concentration camps, executed and buried in mass graves.

    I know these goons. I have been a prisoner in their jails and spent hours in their interrogation rooms. I have been beaten by them. I have been deported, and in several cases banned, from their countries. I know what is coming.

    Terror is the engine that empowers dictatorships. It eliminates dissidents. It silences critics. It dismantles the law. It creates a society of timid and frightened collaborators, those who look away when people are snatched off streets or gunned down, those who inform to save themselves, those who retreat into their tiny rabbit holes, pulling down the blinds, desperately praying to be left in peace.

    Terror works.

    The iron doors have not yet shut. There are still protests. The media is still able to document state atrocities, including the Jan. 7 murder of Renee Nicole Good in Minneapolis by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent Jonathan Ross. But the doors are closing fast. ICE has deported over 300,000 people and detained nearly 69,000 others — as well as been involved in 16 shootings, including four killings — since Trump began his campaign against immigrants.

    ICE, our Americanized Gestapo, is being birthed.

    Resistance must be collective. We must assert not only our individual rights, but economic, social and political rights — without them we are powerless. Resistance means organizing to disrupt the machinery of commerce and government. It means preventing arrests by patrolling neighborhoods to warn of impending ICE raids. It means protesting outside detention facilities. It means strikes. It means blocking streets and highways and occupying buildings. It means providing photographic evidence. It means sustained pressure on local politicians and police to refuse to cooperate with ICE. It means providing legal representation, food and financial assistance to families with members detained. It means a willingness to be arrested. It means a nationwide campaign to defy the state’s inhumanity.

    If we fail, the dimming flames of our open society will be snuffed out.

    Authoritarian states are constructed incrementally. No dictatorship advertises its plan to extinguish civil liberties. It pays lip service to liberty and justice as it dismantles the institutions and laws that make liberty and justice possible. Opponents of the regime, including those within the establishment, make sporadic attempts to resist. They throw up temporary roadblocks, but they are soon purged.

    Alexander Solzhenitsyn in “The Gulag Archipelago” notes that the consolidation of Soviet tyranny “was stretched out over many years because it was of primary importance that it be stealthy and unnoticed.” He called the process “a grandiose silent game of solitaire, whose rules were totally incomprehensible to its contemporaries, and whose outlines we can appreciate only now.”

    “What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family?” Solzhenitsyn asks. “Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand? After all, you knew ahead of time those bluecaps were out at night for no good purpose. And you could be sure ahead of time that you’d be cracking the skull of a cutthroat. Or what about the Black Maria sitting out there on the street with one lonely chauffeur — what if it had been driven off or its tires spiked? The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin’s thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt!”

    Czesław Miłosz, in “The Captive Mind,” also documents the creep of tyranny, how it advances stealthily, until intellectuals are not only forced to repeat the regime’s self-adulating slogans but, as our leading universities did when they caved to false allegations of being bastions of antisemitism, embrace its absurdism.

    Manufactured fear engenders self-doubt. It makes a population — often unconsciously — conform outwardly and inwardly. It conditions citizens to relate to those around them with suspicion and distrust. It destroys the solidarity vital to organizing, community and dissent.

    The historian Robert Gellately, in his book “Backing Hitler: Consent and Coercion in Nazi Germany,” argues that state terror in Nazi Germany was effective not because of omnipresent state surveillance, but because it fostered a “culture of denunciation.”

    Rat out your neighbors and coworkers and survive. If you see something, say something.

    The worse it gets, the more established institutions, desperate to survive, silence those who warn us.

    “Before societies fall, just such a stratum of wise, thinking people emerges, people who are that and nothing more,” Solzhenitsyn writes of those who see what is coming. “And how they were laughed at! How they were mocked!”

    The Austrian writer Joseph Roth, whose early warnings about the rise of fascism were largely dismissed, and who told fellow intellectuals to stop naively appealing to “the remains of a European conscience,” saw his books tossed into the bonfires in the spring of 1933 during the Nazi book burnings. So far, we have not burned books, but have banned nearly 23,000 titles in public schools since 2021.

    The authoritarian state cannibalizes the institutions that foolishly aid and abet the witch hunts. It replaces them with pseudo-institutions populated with pseudo-legislators, pseudo-courts, pseudo-journalists, pseudo-intellectuals and pseudo-citizens. Columbia University is a shining example of this willful self-immolation. Nothing is as it is presented.

    There are increasing numbers of violent kidnappings by masked ICE agents in unmarked cars on our city streets. People are ripped from their vehicles and beaten. They are arrested outside schools and day care centers. They are raided at work, thrown onto the floor, handcuffed, driven away in vans and shipped off to concentration camps in countries such as El Salvador. They are seized when they appear at court for a green card application or interview to finalize a visa.

    Once detained, they disappear into the labyrinth of over 200 detention centers, where they are moved from one facility to the next to hide them from family, lawyers and the courts. Due process, once a constitutional right afforded to everyone in the United States, no longer exists.

    “Laws that are not equal for all revert to rights and privileges, something contradictory to the very nature of nation-states,” Hannah Arendt writes in “The Origins of Totalitarianism.” “The clearer the proof of their inability to treat stateless people as legal persons and the greater the extension of arbitrary rule by police decree, the more difficult it is for states to resist the temptation to deprive all citizens of legal status and rule them with an omnipotent police.”

    The FBI, in an example of how justice is perverted, refuses to cooperate with local law enforcement agencies in Minneapolis, blocking access to any evidence that would allow them to file criminal charges against Jonathan Ross.

    Killing of unarmed citizens by the state is carried out with impunity.

    ICE has more than doubled the size of its force since early 2025 — to 22,000 agents — hiring 12,000 new officers in four months from a pool of 220,000 applicants. It plans to spend $100 million over a one-year period to hire even more recruits, part of the $170 billion for border and interior enforcement, including $75 billion for ICE, to be spent over four years. Salaries for these new recruits, poorly trained and often haphazardly vetted, will range from $49,739 to $89,528 a year, along with a $50,000 signing bonus — split over three years — and up to $60,000 in student loan repayments.

    ICE is building new detention centers nationwide in 23 towns and cities. It promises that once it is fully operational, it will go door-to-door as part of the largest deportation effort in American history.

    ICE agents, intoxicated by the license to kick down doors while wearing body armor and firing automatic weapons at terrified women and children, are not warriors as they imagine, but thugs. They have few skills, other than weapons training, cruelty and brutality. They intend to remain employed by the state. The state intends to keep them employed.

    None of this should surprise us. The repressive techniques used by ICE and our militarized police were perfected overseas in Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Libya and Occupied Palestine, and earlier in Vietnam. The ICE agent who murdered Good was a machinegunner in Iraq. A night raid in Chicago, with agents rappelling from a helicopter to storm an apartment complex filled with terrified families, does not look any different from a night raid in Fallujah.

    Aimé Césaire, the Martinician playwright and politician, in “Discourse on Colonialism” writes that the savage tools of imperialism and colonialism eventually migrate back to the home country. It is known as imperial boomerang.

    Césaire writes:

    And then one fine day the bourgeoisie is awakened by a terrific boomerang effect: the gestapos are busy, the prisons fill up, the torturers standing around the racks invent, refine, discuss.

    People are surprised, they become indignant. They say: “How strange! But never mind—it’s Nazism, it will pass!” And they wait, and they hope; and they hide the truth from themselves, that it is barbarism, the supreme barbarism, the crowning barbarism that sums up all the daily barbarisms; that it is Nazism, yes, but that before they were its victims, they were its accomplices; that they tolerated that Nazism before it was inflicted on them, that they absolved it, shut their eyes to it, legitimized it, because, until then, it had been applied only to non-European peoples; that they have cultivated that Nazism, that they are responsible for it, and that before engulfing the whole edifice of Western, Christian civilization in its reddened waters, it oozes, seeps, and trickles from every crack.

    During the interregnum between the last gasps of a democracy and the emergence of a dictatorship, the nation is gaslighted. It is told the rule of law is respected. It is told democratic rule is inviolate. These lies mollify those being frog-marched into their own enslavement.

    “The majority sit quietly and dare to hope,” Solzhenitsyn writes. “Since you aren’t guilty, then how can they arrest you? It’s a mistake!”

    Maybe, the fearful say, Trump and his minions are only being bombastic. Maybe they don’t mean it. Maybe they are incompetent. Maybe the courts will save us. Maybe the next elections will end this nightmare. Maybe there are limits to extremism. Maybe the worst is over.

    These self-delusions prevent us from resisting while the gallows are being constructed in front of us.

    We refuse to accept a fascist America.Authoritarian states start by targeting the most vulnerable, those most easily demonized — the undocumented, students on college campuses who protest genocide, antifa, the so-called “radical left,” Muslims, poor people of color, intellectuals and liberals. They strike down one group after the next. They blow out, one by one, the long row of candles until we find ourselves in the dark, powerless and alone<


    Editor’s Note: In Minneapolia on Saturday, January 10, 2026 50,000 people marched west Lake St. to 34th St. and Portland Avenue where Renee Good was murdered by ICE Agent Jonathan Ross, who as Chris Hedges has shared with us was a machinegunner in Iraq. Minneapolis is a city under seige as thousands of ICE agents attack not only the Twin Cities but all over the state. Many cities in the US also held large demonstrations in support of Minnesota and against ICE’s reign of terror. Chris is appealing to those who have not yet joined us in resistance. Does it take a murder to activate us? Certainly it raises awareness, and brings close to home for us in Minnesota what has been happening in other cities and states although there was certainly solidarity with those cities before Minnesota was targeted. The murder of a white middle class woman strikes close to a metaphorical home for many of us. As always, I wonder with Trump how one man, along with those supporting him, can be so filled with hate. What a sad way to live and to use up their lives. 


    In one of the scariest moments in modern history, we’re doing our best at ScheerPost to pierce the fog of lies that conceal it but we need some help to pay our writers and staff. Please consider a tax-deductible donation to ScheerPost, Please, if you can, sign up at chrishedges.substack.com so I can continue to post my now weekly Monday column on ScheerPost and produce my weekly television show, The Chris Hedges Report.


    Chris Hedges is a Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist who was a foreign correspondent for fifteen years for The New York Times, where he served as the Middle East Bureau Chief and Balkan Bureau Chief for the paper. He previously worked overseas for The Dallas Morning NewsThe Christian Science Monitor, and NPR. He is the host of show The Chris Hedges Report.

    He was a member of the team that won the 2002 Pulitzer Prize for Explanatory Reporting for The New York Times coverage of global terrorism, and he received the 2002 Amnesty International Global Award for Human Rights Journalism. Hedges, who holds a Master of Divinity from Harvard Divinity School, is the author of the bestsellers American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on AmericaEmpire of Illusion: The End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle and was a National Book Critics Circle finalist for his book War Is a Force That Gives Us Meaning. He writes an online column for the website ScheerPost. He has taught at Columbia University, New York University, Princeton University and the University of Toronto.

    Wings of Change is entirely reader supported.
    Wings invites you to subscribe.
    Join us on Wings of Change

    In this critical time hearing voices of truth is all the more important although censorship and attacks on truth-tellers are common. Support WingsofChange.me as we bring you important articles and journalism beyond the mainstream corporate media on the Wings of Change website and Rise Up Times on social media  Access is always free, but if you would like to help:
    A donation of $25 or whatever you can donate will bring you articles and opinions from independent websites, writers, and journalists as well as a blog with the opinions and creative contributions by myself and others

    Sue Ann Martinson, Editor Wings of Change

  • Update: Trump Declares Emergency Powers as Republicans Push Back | George Will

    Update: Trump Declares Emergency Powers as Republicans Push Back | George Will

    UPDATE JANUARY 12, 2026

    The Supreme Court has refused to grant Trump total immunity. Discussion of what this action means and how it stands with the US Constitution and its effect on democracy in a bipartisan ruling.

    Something unusual is happening inside Washington — and it’s not coming from the opposition. In this video, we break down the growing internal revolt inside the Republican Party as lawmakers begin pushing back against Donald Trump’s expanding use of power.

    Something unusual is happening inside Washington — and it’s not coming from the opposition. In this video, we break down the growing internal revolt inside the Republican Party as lawmakers begin pushing back against Donald Trump’s expanding use of power. From emergency declarations to congressional resistance, this is a behind-the-scenes political showdown that goes far beyond daily headlines.This analysis explores why Republican senators are drawing new lines, how constitutional checks like the War Powers framework are suddenly back in focus, and what this moment reveals about leadership, authority, and accountability in modern American politics. Rather than partisan outrage, this video focuses on process, power, and the long-term consequences for governance.


     “In the end there is no democracy without informed citizens, no justice without a language critical of injustice, and no change without a broad-based movement of collective resistance.”

    —Henry Giroux


    RELATED



    Wings of Change is entirely reader supported.
    Wings invites you to subscribe.
    Join us on Wings of Change

    In this critical time hearing voices of truth is all the more important although censorship and attacks on truth-tellers are common. Support WingsofChange.me as we bring you important articles and journalism beyond the mainstream corporate media on the Wings of Change website and Rise Up Times on social media  Access is always free, but if you would like to help:
    A donation of $25 or whatever you can donate will bring you articles and opinions from independent websites, writers, and journalists as well as a blog with the opinions and creative contributions by myself and others

    Sue Ann Martinson, Editor Wings of Change

  • HAMAS UNFILTERED! Chris Hedges: Trump, Palestine, Iran & the Collapse of U.S. Media.

    HAMAS UNFILTERED! Chris Hedges: Trump, Palestine, Iran & the Collapse of U.S. Media.

    “I asked Palestinians about Hamas. This is what they said.”

    Chris Hedges joins India & Global Left to break down the the deeper meaning of Trump’s rise, the real motives behind U.S. policy on Iran, Jeffrey Epstein and more.

    Trump, Palestine, Iran & the Collapse of U.S. Media: empire, resistance, and the cost of silence

    Pulitzer Prize–winning journalist Chris Hedges joins India & Global Left to break down the moral and political crisis of our time. We discuss: The deeper meaning of Trump’s rise U.S. complicity in Israel’s war on Palestine The real motives behind U.S. policy on Iran The Jeffrey Epstein case and elite impunity And how the corporate media has failed the public This is a sweeping conversation about empire, resistance, and the cost of silence.



    In this critical time in our country hearing the voices of truth and engaging in honest discussion for critical issues is all the more important while censorship (and outright lies) along with attacks on truth-tellers are common. Support the WingsofChange.me website and Rise Up Times on social media as we to bring you important articles and journalism beyond the mainstream corporate media. Access is alway free, but if you would like to help:
    Wings of Change FeatherWhatever you are able donate will bring you articles and opinions from independent websites, writers, and journalists as well as a blog with the opinions and creative contributions.

    One place to begin is with reason and truth, and how fundamental they are to creating critically engaged citizens and communities. 

    —Henry A. Giroux

  • Chris Hedges: Abolishing the First Amendment

    Chris Hedges: Abolishing the First Amendment

    Our sin was that we dared to mention the unmentionable – the genocide in Gaza.

    Abolishing the First Amendment

    Those who testified at the state capital against New Jersey’s adoption of the IHRA, arguing that it would criminalize free speech, had our microphones muted and were shouted down, proving our point.

    The Final, Final Solution – by Mr. Fish

    By Chris Hedges / The Chris Hedges Report / ScheerPost / July 29, 2025

    I testified at the New Jersey state capital in Trenton last week against Bill A3558, which would adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism, which conflates anti-Zionism with antisemitism.

    Chis Hedges testimony is included in the video below. Links are also included in the text.

    “This is a dangerous assault on free speech by seeking to criminalize legitimate criticism of Israeli policies,” I said. “The Trump administration’s campaign to ostensibly root out antisemitism on college campuses is clearly a trope to shut down free speech and deport non-citizens, even if they are here legally. This bill falsely conflates ethnicity with a political state. And let’s be clear, the brunt of repression on college campuses is directed against students and faculty who oppose the genocide in Gaza, 3,000 of whom were arrested and hundreds of whom were censored, suspended or expelled. Many of these students are Jewish. What about their rights? What about their constitutional protections?”

    “I have had numerous relationships with Israeli journalists and political leaders,” I went on. “I knew, for example, former Israeli prime minister Yitzhak Rabin who negotiated the Oslo peace agreement. Rabin was assassinated in 1995 by an Israeli ultranationalist who opposed the peace accord. Rabin stated bluntly on numerous occasions that the occupation was harmful to Israel. Israeli colleagues frequently criticize Israeli policies in the Israeli press in language that would be defined as antisemitic by this bill.”

    “For example,” I continued, “the Israeli journalist Gideon Levy, who served in the Israeli army and writes for the newspaper Haaretz, has called for sanctions to be imposed on Israel to stop the slaughter in Gaza, saying ‘Do to Israel what you did to South Africa.’”

    “Omer Bartov, who served as an Israeli company commander in the 1973 war, is Professor of Holocaust and Genocide Studies at Brown University,” I said. “He stated in an article on July 15 in The New York Times that his ‘inescapable conclusion has become that Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinian people.’”

    “These kinds of statements, and many more I can quote from Israeli colleagues and friends, would see them under this bill criminalized as antisemites,” I added.

    Committee chairman Robert Karabinchak, a Democrat, muted my microphone, banged his hammer for me to stop and allowed gaggles of Zionists, who openly harassed and insulted Muslims in the room, to jeer and shout me down.

    There I was arguing that this bill would curtail my free speech, at the same time I was being denied free speech.

    You can see my full testimony here.

    This cognitive dissonance defines the United States and Israel.

    The committee chairman also muted Raz Segal, the Israeli historian and genocide scholar and, in an especially callous move, chastised Mehdi Rabee, whose 14-year-old brother Amer was killed by Israeli soldiers in April 2025.

    “My 14-year-old brother who was from Saddlebrook, New Jersey, was murdered by the IDF,” Mehdi, his voice shaking with emotion, told the committee. “All he was doing was picking olives from an olive tree with his friends, which we have been doing as Palestinians for thousands of years. My brother, whom I will never see again, my brother who my parents will never watch graduate from high school or college. Assemblywoman Swain, my father and the Palestinian-American Community Center tried reaching out to you over and over. And all that we were met with was nothing but silence. Given your silence, you should not have the right to even consider voting for this bill until you meet with my family, who are under your district.”

    “I am going to ask you to stick to the bill,” Karabinchak interrupted.

    “This bill puts at risk my First Amendment right to criticize Israel for what they have done to my brother,” he went on. “I have a right to call Israel whatever I want to call it. When their policies mirror that of the Nazis, I have a right to call it as it is. I call on you to vote no in remembrance of my brother.”

    FIRST AMENDMENT TO U.S. CONSTITUTION

    You can see Mehdi’s statement here.

    Karabinchak, angered that supporters gave Rabee a standing ovation, reduced all testimonies critical of the bill from three minutes to one minute.

    “Time is down to one minute,” he told the crowd of about 400 in the committee and four overflow rooms. “I’m going to ask everybody now to speak, who wants to speak, is going to say ‘I oppose the bill’ or ‘I support the bill.’”

    He paused.

    “Let’s have some more claps,” he said, his voice dripping with sarcasm. “Let’s be happy now, right? I didn’t throw you out like I said I was going to. So now you just stifled the other people who have a right to speak. That’s what you just did! Understand what you did! Okay? One minute. One minute. That’s it. And I’m not going to be nice and say let’s rap it up. I’m going to shut the mic off. ”

    Our sin was that we dared to mention the unmentionable – the genocide in Gaza.

    The Zionists in the room were verbally and physically abusive to the Muslims who had come to oppose the bill. One Zionist repeatedly shoved himself into the bodies of those outside the state capital holding a rally against the bill.

    You can see his harassment here.

    Amy Gallatin, who is on the commission of the West Orange Human Relations Commission, “established by municipal ordinance in 1992 in order to create and foster values of diversity, equity and inclusion among groups in the community,” pulled up pictures on her iPad in one of the overflow rooms and said to those seated around her “Look, its Mohammed!”

    You can see her Islamophobic hate speech here.

    When Rabbi Yitzchok Deutsch made an emotional plea to save the people of Gaza Lisa Swain of District 38 and Assemblyman Avi Schnall of District 30, both Democrats, snickered and laughed as he spoke.

    You can see their reactions to Rabbi Deutsch here.

    Zionists, who painted lurid pictures of Jews living under harassment and in fear for their lives, and of Nazism supposedly running amok on the streets of New Jersey, were not muted, although their statements were hyperbolic to the extreme and often a product of over-active imaginations. They openly salivated at the adoption of the bill, which they said would give law enforcement the tools to criminalize those who engage in hate speech, which, if you read the “contemporary examples of antisemitism,” that accompany the IHRA, include speech that criticizes Israeli policies.

    The IHRA has been adopted by 35 states, the District of Columbia and universities such as Harvard and Columbia.

    “The IHRA working definition of antisemitism includes protected criticism of Israel and its policies,” writes the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). “For example, the definition declares that ‘denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor,’ ‘drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis,’ and ‘applying double standards by requiring of [Israel] a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation’ are all examples of antisemitism.”

    “If the Department of Education were to adopt this definition, and investigate universities for Title VI complaints based on it, college and university administrators would likely silence a range of protected speech including criticism of the Israeli government’s treatment of Palestinians, analogies likening Israeli policies to those of Nazi Germany, or sharing differing beliefs about the right to a Jewish state,” the ACLU continues. “People may disagree about whether such speech is antisemitic, but that debate is irrelevant to the First Amendment, which prohibits the government from censoring or penalizing core political speech.”

    U.S. attorney Kenneth S. Stern — a self-professed Zionist and the lead drafter of what became the IHRA definition of antisemitism — laments that the IHRA has been “grossly abused” to “restrict academic freedom and punish political speech,” including “pro-Palestinian speech.”

    The five committee members, who had clearly made up their minds before they entered the packed hearing room, unanimously passed the measure, which will go to the floor of the State Assembly for a vote. They will, like all politicians who bow before the dictates of the Israel lobby, no doubt, be compensated for their perfidy.

    America, like Israel, exists in a parallel reality. It denies the stark and incontrovertible reality of the live-streamed genocide. It slanders anyone, including Israeli holocaust scholars such as Professor Segal, as antisemites.

    I know, sadly, where this goes. I witnessed it in the many dictatorships I covered as a foreign correspondent for two decades in Latin America, the Middle East, Africa and the Balkans. Those of us who fight for an open society are silenced, attacked as traitors and criminals. We are blacklisted, censored and at times, locked up. If we can escape in time, we are forced into exile. As we are silenced, the sycophants, grifters, Christian fascists, billionaires, Zionists and thugs, elevated to the highest positions in the federal government by the Trump White House, are rewarded with absolute power, luxury and debauchery.

    Our corporate-indentured ruling class has no genuine political ideology. Political parties are a farce, a species of entertainment to beguile the population in our pretend democracy. Liberalism, and the values it claims to represent, is a spent and bankrupt force.

    The burlesque in the committee room in Trenton was another depressing reminder that there is little now that will halt our path towards an authoritarian state, not the press, not the universities, not the courts, which cannot enforce the few rulings made by courageous judges, not the political classincluding the Democratic Party, and not the electoral process.

    We must resist, if only to assert our integrity and dignity, if only to stand in solidarity with the oppressed, if only to slow the consolidation of tyranny, if only to revel in the small pyrrhic victories that resistance alone makes possible.

    But we should not be fooled.

    Subscribe here for more

     



    In this critical time in our country hearing the voices of truth and engaging in honest discussion for critical issues is all the more important while censorship (and outright lies) along with attacks on truth-tellers are common. Support the WingsofChange.me website and Rise Up Times on social media as we to bring you important articles and journalism beyond the mainstream corporate media. Access is alway free, but if you would like to help:
    Wings of Change FeatherWhatever you are able donate will bring you articles and opinions from independent websites, writers, and journalists as well as a blog with the opinions and creative contributions.

  • Glenn Greenwald: Palantir EXPOSED;  DN! “Purge Palantir”

    Glenn Greenwald: Palantir EXPOSED; DN! “Purge Palantir”

    “Everyone is converting to Palantir…”

     

     


    Palantir EXPOSED: The New Deep State

    By Glenn Greenwald / System Update / June 10, 2025

    This is a clip from the show SYSTEM UPDATE, now airing every weeknight at 7pm ET on Rumble. You can watch the full episode for FREE here: https://rumble.com/v6ujj1n-system-upd…



    Democracy Now! “Purge Palantir”: Day of Action Protests Firm’s Role in Gov’t Surveillance, ICE & Genocide in Gaza

    Protesters across the United States targeted Palantir Monday [7/14/25] in a day of action focused on the technology company’s work with ICE, facilitating President Trump’s expanding immigration crackdown, and work with the Israeli military. New York police arrested at least four people Monday after demonstrators blocked the entrance to the company’s Manhattan offices. Democracy Now! spoke to protesters, including some who work in the technology sector, about the “Purge Palantir” campaign and how Palantir’s data mining, surveillance and automation tools are being weaponized against vulnerable communities. We speak with Wired senior writer Makena Kelly, who has been covering Palantir and says many Silicon Valley firms are “trying to find opportunity in this chaos” as the Trump administration slashes government services and pursues mass deportations.

    Guests
    Makena Kelly
    Wired Senior Writer focused on the intersection of politics, power and technology.

    Links
    “This is DOGE 2.0”

    Please check back to Democracy now later for full transcript.

    The original content of this program is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. Please attribute legal copies of this work to democracynow.org. Some of the work(s) that this program incorporates, however, may be separately licensed. For further information or additional permissions, contact us.

    More on Glenn Greenwald’s System Update:
    Now available as a podcast! Find full episodes here: https://linktr.ee/systemupdate_
    Join us LIVE on Rumble, weeknights at7pm ET: https://rumble.com/c/GGreenwald
    Become part of our Locals community:
    https://greenwald.locals.com/
    Follow Glenn: Twitter:   / ggreenwald  
    Instagram:
      / glenn.11.greenwald  
    Follow System Update:
    Twitter:
      / systemupdate_  
    Instagram:   / systemupdate__  
    TikTok:
      / systemupdate__  
    Facebook:
      / systemupdate.tv  
    LinkedIn:
      / systemupdate


    In this critical time in our country hearing the voices of truth is all the more important although censorship and attacks on truth-tellers is common. Support the WingsofChange.me website and Rise Up Times on social media. striving to bring you important articles and journalism beyond the mainstream corporate media. Access is alway free, but if you would like to help:
    Wings of Change FeatherA donation of $25 or whatever you can donate will bring you articles and opinions from independent websites, writers, and journalists as well as a blog with the opinions and creative contributions by myself and others

    Sue Ann Martinson, Writer, Editor Wings of Change

  • Chris Hedges: Trump’s Useful Idiots

    Chris Hedges: Trump’s Useful Idiots

    The perpetuation of the fiction of widespread antisemitism, which of course exists but which is not fostered or condoned by these institutions, coupled with the refusal to say out loud what is being live streamed to the world, has shattered what little moral authority these institutions and liberals had left. It gives credibility to Trump’s effort to cripple and destroy all institutions that sustain a liberal democracy.
    Trump’s Useful Idiots – by Mr. Fish

       by Chris Hedges/ Original to ScheerPost/ May 27, 2025

    The media, universities, the Democratic Party and liberals, by embracing the fiction of “rampant antisemitism,” laid the groundwork for their own demise. Columbia and Princeton, where I have taught, and Harvard, which I attended, are not incubators of hatred towards Jews. The New York Times, where I worked for fifteen years and which Trump calls “an enemy of the people,” is slavishly subservient to the Zionist narrative. What these institutions have in common is not antisemitism, but liberalism. And liberalism, with its creed of pluralism and inclusiveness, is slated by our authoritarian regime for obliteration.

    The conflation of outrage over the genocide with antisemitism is a sleazy tactic to silence protest and placate Zionist donors, the billionaire class and advertisers. These liberal institutions, weaponizing antisemitism, aggressively silenced and expelled critics, banned student groups such as Jewish Voice for Peace and Students for Justice in Palestine, allowed police to make hundreds of arrests of peaceful protests on campuses, purged professors and groveled before Congress. Use the words ‘apartheid’ and ‘genocide’ and you are fired or excoriated.

    Zionist Jews, in this fictional narrative, are the oppressed. Jews who protest the genocide are slandered as Hamas stooges and punished. Good Jews. Bad Jews. One group deserves protection. The other deserves to be thrown to the wolves. This odious bifurcation exposes the charade.

    In April 2024, Columbia University President Minouche Shafik, along with two board members and a law professor, testified before the House of Representative education committee. They accepted the premise that antisemitism was a significant problem at Columbia and other higher education institutions.

    When Co-Chair of the Board of Trustees of Columbia University David Greenwald and others told the committee that they believed  “from the river to the sea” and “long live the intifada” were antisemitic statements, Shafik agreed. She threw students and faculty under the bus, including long-time professor Joseph Massad.

    The day after the hearings, Shafik suspended all the students at the Columbia protests and called in the New York City Police Department (NYPD), who arrested at least 108 students.

    “I have determined that the encampment and related disruptions pose a clear and present danger to the substantial functioning of the University,” Shafik wrote in her letter to the police.

    NYPD Chief John Chell, however, told the press, “the students that were arrested were peaceful, offered no resistance whatsoever, and were saying what they wanted to say in a peaceful manner.”

    “What disciplinary action has been taken against that professor?” Representative Elise Stefanik asked in the hearing about Columbia law Professor Katherine Franke.

    Shafik volunteered that Franke, who is Jewish and whose position at the law school where she had taught for 25 years was terminated, and other professors, were being investigated. In an apparent reference to visiting Columbia Professor Mohamed Abdou, she claimed he was “terminated” and promised he “will never teach at Columbia again.” Professor Abdou is suing Columbia for defamation, discrimination, harassment and financial and professional loss.

    The Center for Constitutional Rights wrote of the betrayal of Franke:

    In an egregious attack on both academic freedom and Palestinian rights advocacy, Columbia University has entered into an “agreement” with Katherine Franke to leave her teaching position after an esteemed 25-year career. The move — “a termination dressed up in more palatable terms,” according to Franke’s statement — stems from her advocacy for students who speak out in support of Palestinian rights.

    Her ostensible offense was a comment expressing concern about Columbia’s failure to address harassment of Palestinians and their allies by Israeli students who come to campus straight from military service — after Israeli students sprayed Palestinian rights protestors with a toxic chemical. For this, she was investigated for harassment and found to be in violation of Columbia’s policies. The actual cause of her forced departure is the crackdown on dissent at Columbia resulting from historic protests opposing Israel’s genocide of Palestinians in Gaza. Franke’s fate was sealed when former Columbia president Minouche Shafik threw her under the bus during her cowardly appearance before Congress.

    You can see my [Hedges] interview with Franke here.

    Despite her capitulation to the Zionist lobby, Shark resigned a little more than a year after assuming her position as head of the university.

    The crackdown at Columbia continues, with an estimated 80 people arrested and over 65 students suspended following a protest in the library in the first week of May. Former television journalist and Columbia’s acting president Claire Shipman condemned the protest, stating, “Disruptions to our academic activities will not be tolerated and are violations of our rules and policies…Columbia strongly condemns violence on our campus, antisemitism and all forms of hate and discrimination, some of which we witnessed today.”

    Of course, appeasement does not work. This witch hunt, whether under the Biden or Trump administration, was never grounded in good faith. It was about decapitating Israel’s critics and marginalizing the liberal class and the left. It is sustained by lies and slander, which these institutions continue to embrace.

    Watching these liberal institutions, who are hostile to the left, be smeared by Trump for harboring “Marxist lunatics,” “radical leftists,” and “communists,” exposes another failing of the liberal class. It was the left that could have saved these institutions or at least given them the fortitude, not to mention analysis, to take a principled stand. The left at least calls apartheid apartheid and genocide genocide.

    Media outlets regularly publish articles and OpEds uncritically accepting claims made by Zionist students and faculty. They fail to clarify the distinction between being Jewish and being Zionist. They demonize student protesters. They never bothered reporting with any depth or honesty from the student encampments where Jews, Muslims and Christians made common cause. They routinely mischaracterize anti-Zionist, anti-genocide and pro-Palestinian liberation slogans and policy demands as hate speech, antisemitic, or contributing to Jewish students feeling unsafe.

    Examples include, The New York Times: “Why the Campus Protests Are So Troubling,” “I’m a Columbia Professor. The Protests on My Campus Are Not Justice,” and “Universities Face an Urgent Question: What Makes a Protest Antisemitic?”; The Washington Post: “Call the campus protests what they are” “At Columbia, excuse the students, but not the faculty”; The Atlantic: “Campus Protest Encampments Are Unethical” and “Columbia University’s anti-Semitism Problem”; Slate: “When Pro-Palestine Protests Cross Into Antisemitism”; Vox: The Rising Tide of Antisemitism on College Campuses Amid Gaza Protests”; Mother Jones: “How Pro-Palestine Protests Spark Antisemitism on Campus”; The Cut (New York Magazine): “The Problem With Pro-Palestine Protests on Campus”; and The Daily Beast: “Antisemitism Surges Amid Pro-Palestine Protests at U.S. Universities.”

    The New York Times, in a decision worthy of George Orwell, instructed its reporters to eschew words such “refugee camps,” “occupied territory,” “slaughter,” “massacre,” “carnage,” “genocide” and “ethnic cleansing,” when writing about Palestine, according to an internal memo obtained by The Intercept. It discourages the very use of the word “Palestine” in routine text and headlines.

    In December 2023, Democratic Governor of New York Kathy Hochul sent a letter to university and college presidents who failed to condemn and address “antisemitism,” and calls for the “genocide of any group.” She warned that they would be subjected to “aggressive enforcement action” by New York State. The following year, in late August, Hochul repeated these warnings during a virtual meeting with 200 university and college leaders.

    Hochul made clear in October 2024 that she considered pro-Palestine slogans  to be explicit calls for genocide of Jews.

    “There are laws on the books – human rights laws, state and federal laws – that I will enforce if you allow for the discrimination of our students on campus, even calling for the genocide of the Jewish people which is what is meant by ‘From the river to the sea,’ by the way,” she said at a memorial event at the Temple Israel Center in White Plains. “Those are not innocent sounding words. They’re filled with hate.”

    The Governor successfully pressured City University of New York (CUNY) to remove a job posting for a Palestinian studies professorship at Hunter College which referenced “settler colonialism,” “genocide” and “apartheid.”

    Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer in his new book “Antisemitism in America: A Warning,” leads efforts by the Democratic Party — which has a dismal 27 percent approval rating in a recent NBC News poll — to denounce those protesting the genocide as carrying out a “blood libel” against Jews.

    “Whatever one’s view of how the war in Gaza was conducted, it is not and has never been the policy of the Israeli government to exterminate the Palestinian people,” he writes, ignoring hundreds of calls by Israeli officials to wipe Palestinians from the face of the earth during 19 months of saturation bombing and enforced starvation.

    The grisly truth, openly acknowledged by Israeli officials, is far different.

    “We are disassembling Gaza, and leaving it as piles of rubble, with total destruction [which has] no precedent globally. And the world isn’t stopping us,” gloats Israel’s Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich.

    “Last night, almost 100 Gazans were killed…it doesn’t interest anyone. Everyone has gotten used to [the fact] that [we can] kill 100 Gazans in one night during a war and nobody cares in the world,” Israeli Knesset member Zvi Sukkottold Israel’s Channel 12 on May 16.

    The perpetuation of the fiction of widespread antisemitism, which of course exists but which is not fostered or condoned by these institutions, coupled with the refusal to say out loud what is being live streamed to the world, has shattered what little moral authority these institutions and liberals had left. It gives credibility to Trump’s effort to cripple and destroy all institutions that sustain a liberal democracy.

    Trump surrounds himself with neo-Nazi sympathizers such as Elon Musk, and Christian fascists who condemn Jews for crucifying Christ. But antisemitism by the right gets a free pass since these “good” antisemites cheer on Israel’s settler colonial project of extermination, one these neo-Nazis and Christian fascists would like to replicate on Brown and Black in the name of the great replacement theory. Trump trumpets the fiction of “white genocide” in South Africa. He signed an executive order in February that fast-tracked immigration to the U.S. for Afrikaners — white South Africans.

    Harvard, which is attempting to save itself from the wrecking ball of the Trump administration, was as complicit in this witch hunt as everyone else, flagellating itself for not being more repressive towards campus critics of the genocide.

    The university’s former president Claudine Gay condemned the pro-Palestine slogan “From the river to the sea, Palestine will be free,” which demands the right of an independent Palestinian state alongside Israel, as bearing “specific historical meanings that to a great many people imply the eradication of Jews from Israel.”

    Harvard substantially tightened its regulations regarding student protests, in January 2024, and increased the police presence on its campus. It barred 13 students from graduating, citing alleged policy violations linked to their participation in a protest encampment, despite an earlier agreement to avoid punitive measures. It placed more than 20 students on “involuntary leave” and in some cases evicted students from their housing.

    Such policies were replicated across the country.

    The capitulations and crackdowns on pro-Palestine activism, academic freedom, freedom of speech, suspensions, expulsions and firings, since Oct. 7, 2023, have not spared U.S. colleges and universities from further attacks.

    Since Trump took office, at least $11 billion in federal research grants and contracts have been cut or frozen nationwide according to NPR. This includes Harvard ($3 billion), Columbia ($400 million), University of Pennsylvania ($175 million) and Brandeis ($6-7.5 million annually).

    On May 22, the Trump administration intensified its attacks on Harvard by terminating its ability to enroll international students that make up around 27 percent of the student body.

    “This administration is holding Harvard accountable for fostering violence, antisemitism, and coordinating with the Chinese Communist Party on its campus,” Kristi Noem, DHS Secretary wrote on X, when posting screenshots of the letter she sent to Harvard revoking foreign student enrollment. “Let this serve as a warning to all universities and academic institutions across the country.”

    Harvard, like Columbia, the media, the Democratic Party and the liberal class, misread power. By refusing to acknowledge or name the genocide in Gaza, and persecuting those who do, they provided the bullets to their executioners.

    They are paying the price for their stupidity and cowardice.


    NOTE TO SCHEERPOST READERS FROM CHRIS HEDGES: There is now no way left for me to continue to write a weekly column for ScheerPost and produce my weekly television show without your help. The walls are closing in, with startling rapidity, on independent journalism, with the elites, including the Democratic Party elites, clamoring for more and more censorship. Bob Scheer, who runs ScheerPost on a shoestring budget, and I will not waver in our commitment to independent and honest journalism, and we will never put ScheerPost behind a paywall, charge a subscription for it, sell your data or accept advertising. Please, if you can, sign up at chrishedges.substack.com so I can continue to post my now weekly Monday column on ScheerPost and produce my weekly television show, The Chris Hedges Report.


    Wings of Change.

    Independent media is essential. Truth is not fake news, misinformation or disinformation.  “Reasonable minds can disagree on solutions, but making progress as a society requires a willingness to learn facts, appreciate nuance, and engage in meaningful debate.” Barbara McQuade, Introduction, Attack from Within, How Disinformation is sabotaging America.
    Please donate to Wings of Change and share this article to support meaningful debate in America
    Wings of Change

  • The Unraveling of the New Deal, Part 2

    The Unraveling of the New Deal, Part 2

    [FDR] changed the relationship between government, business and labor forever.
    —Doris Kerns Goodwin

    The Unraveling of the New Deal, Part 2

    Link to Part 1

    Minneapolis Union Strike of 2934

    The Minneapolis Teamster’s Strike, 1934

    Labor and Civil Rights and Civil Liberties

    Civil Rights and Civil Liberties are so much a part of Labor History in the United States that while they can also be separate, they are often inextricably tied to Labor in many instances. Immigration is linked to labor history as new immigrants were a labor force often mistreated and therefore became strong labor activists. For Black people the struggle for civil rights was constant and often linked to labor issues.

    Some Immigration History and Now

    Immigration is another area that Trump is active in, attempting to export as many refugees as possible, often in cases where they are actually in the U.S. legally. One example is Mahmoud Khalil, a young student with a green card who was arrested along with his pregnant wife, a U.S. citizen, for his pro-Palestine protests and activities, whose treatment is meant to make other protesters afraid.

    FDR did not single out any particular group of immigrants; he included them all. He recognized the contributions they were making to the U.S. economy and culture. The influx of immigrants was initially primarily from Europe with the exception of the Chinese on the west coast whose labor built the western railroads to connect with the east for rails to cross the continent in the 1860s. 

    They came from Ireland during the potato famine in the mid 1800s, and many as refugees from Europe after WWI, and were followed by those who came just before and after WWII. In more recent times they have come from countries in Asia as a result of the Vietnam War when many Vietnamese and Hmong came to Minnesota.

    The latest waves of immigrants have arrived from the Middle East wars and from Africa. Minnesota now has a large Somali population as many have immigrated due to our wars in their country. Many now are from other African countries as well, where settler colonialism has left them war-torn and the people destitute as multinational corporations from Western multinationals  have robbed them of their natural resources and in effect enslaved their people to do hard labor in their mines.

    Last, but certainly not least, many Spanish- or Portuguese-speaking people from South and Central America have left their countries to come to the United States, some fleeing from extreme dictatorships as political refugees and others from poor countries to better their economic situations. Their presence is evidenced by the need to have many formal government documents translated into Spanish, as well as Somali and other languages.

    “Migrant Mother,” taken by Dorothea Lange in 1936, depicting Florence Owens Thompson, a mother with her children, during the Great Depression. Source: Wikipedia. Photo now is in the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

    Many Hispanic people originally came to work in the large farms that grew fruits and vegetables in California. Some even came to Minnesota to work for Green Giant, resulting in an area on the west side of St. Paul where many settled and stayed.  The fight of these workers to unionize and to demand decent living accommodations and wages is well-documented in film, song and books that describe their struggle; often they feature union organizers Cesar Chavez and Delores Huerta.

    I might also add that the variety of ethnic groups represented as evidenced by the foods available from the many ethnic restaurants here in Minnesota— adding the food of the Black and Native cultures as well—speaks to America being a nation of immigrants, as it has been since the Mayflower.

    Trump’s current attacks on immigrants and immigrant rights are massive as he arrests and deports recent immigrants illegally and with cold-hearted precision. There has been information about the treatment of the deportees in, for example, El Salvador where the accommodations are similar to the Nazi death camps in Germany in WWII, if not worse. He is snatching people off the streets, including students, and sending them to an ICE facility in Louisiana that is reported to be the worst in the country with a reputation for prisoner abuse. How he could possibly care about people is beyond comprehension. The contributions of immigrants to American culture, science, and so on are well-documented in books, articles and on the web.

    Remembering Tammany Hall of legend in New York City, where the cops were all Irish: they had a stranglehold on the government and they were corrupt. I use that as an example because they were white, although sometimes were considered to be of another race to denigrate them. They also helped immigrants, particularly their own. The contributions of Tammany may have been somewhat negative, but they were not all the Irish who came to America during the famine. Men of Irish heritage fought on both the Confederate and the Union sides during the Civil War. Irish contributions to the culture of song and dance are immeasurable, especially when you live across the Mississippi River in Minneapolis and visit sister city St. Paul on St. Patrick’s Day. Or visit, in my case, my Irish heritage friends who have done so much good in this world, not to mention a brother of theirs who was in the state legislature for many years. These Catholic Sisters of St. Joseph were rightfully honored by St. Paul’s History Theater with a play of their own. The Irish have left their positive imprint all over the United States in spite of prejudice because of their  Roman Catholic religion. (“No Irish Need Apply.”)

    Now we have the immigrants from the Middle East, Africa, and those from across the southern border from South and Central America who work in the hotels and often as cleaners in various industries. From Somalia: many Somali men are taxi and truck drivers, at least here in Minnesota. Many are Muslims, and have built a number of mosques in Minneapolis and suburbs.

    The immigration starting basically during my lifetime includes refugees from Vietnam and then the Hmong; it continues to the present day where many new African immigrants work in senior or rehabilitation facilities as nurses or nurses’ aids along with jobs in industry. 

    In other words, they are assimilating. And no, I do not see them so often in the suburbs when I visit. I live in the city, but since George Floyd I see them more often than I used to. What is important is to understand the waves of immigrants who have come to this country and the contributions they have made and that not all white immigrants were good people. But then not all were bad either, and Trump’s attempt to lump all immigrants, especially immigrants of color, into one evil group is in itself an evil, as are his deportations: especially the Hispanics that he is deporting right and left and the pro-Palestinian young college students, as he targets especially those who have taken action against genocide in Gaza.

    In another racist/white supremacist move he has promised to restore all the monuments, the statues, torn down in the time of George Floyd protests that honored the Civil War Confederates in a glorification of both war and racism.

    Of course there is no such thing as one evil race. In the history of the world not only has evil come from all races, including white of course, but also so many of the brilliant people who have made contributions to world culture are from a variety different races; I think particularly of music, poetry and art, but also science, which, because of its nature in work often done away from the public eye, is not acknowledged as often. No one race can claim total superiority.  Or total evil either.

    Trump’s obsession with The Wall that is between the U.S. and Mexico is not MAGA, not Make America Great Again, but MEGA in the sense of huge as he has ordered new walls built and increased border patrols, a militarization of the border between the U.S. and Mexico.

    And he insists on drawing that “color line,” this time against Hispanics.

    Trump’s father once evicted Woody Guthrie because he couldn’t pay his rent. Woody immortalized it in song.

    I suppose that Old Man Trump knows just how much racial hate
    He stirred up in that bloodpot of human hearts
    When he drawed that color line
    Here at his Beach Haven family project

    Beach Haven ain’t my home!
    No, I just can’t pay this rent!
    My money’s down the drain,
    And my soul is badly bent!
    Beach Haven is Trump’s Tower
    Where no black folks come to roam,
    No, no, Old Man Trump!
    Old Beach Haven ain’t my home!

    But Trump of course is not alone in his efforts to destroy the good that America has done, the American values that so many have fought and died for and others have striven to not just preserve but make active and real in our daily lives, and continue to do so.

    The 2025 program that Trump embraces was created by the Heritage Foundation. Much of a Republican Congress and some Democrats also support what he is doing as he continues to destroy America: There is no other way to describe it. He stands at the titular head of it all with his narcissism and his greed for approval and power, a W.T. Barnum of politics as he centers himself in “the greatest show on earth” as the American Empire crumbles.

    Black People Under FDR

    FDR did more for Black people than any previous president. He had what was called a Black Cabinet that was involved in labor. The Black Cabinet was an unofficial group of African-American advisors to FDR. They ensured that thousands of Black women and men received the training that enabled them to work in the defense industry during World War II. And while helping reverse segregation in the federal workforce, they brought about the first anti-discrimination clauses in government contracts.

    Lynching Law

    Although not related directly to labor, the Roosevelt connection to a lynching law also needs to be mentioned. A law against lynching was controversial at the time, although Eleanor Roosevelt was an avid supporter of creating a federal law against it. She even arranged a meeting between Walter White of the NAACP and FDR. White was an American civil rights activist who led the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) for a quarter of a century, from 1929 until 1955. White directed a broad program of legal challenges to racial segregation and disfranchisement. But because of the southern senators who could block bills that FDR favored, especially Social Security, even though in private he expressed opposition to lynching, it took many years before a federal law took effect. (Ken Burns: The Roosevelts, Episode 5, PBS.) President Biden signed a federal bill making lynching a hate crime on March 29, 2022.

    “The Spirit of the “People”

    The spirit of the New Deal, with its emphasis on the people, a government “of the people, by the people, and for the people,” was not a government for what FDR called the “Economic Royalists,” who held power over the people. Today one name for them is the “ruling elite.” It is true that the U.S. Constitution as originally conceived favored white male landowners. That bias has to some extent been preserved; the white moneyed elite that today takes form in racism as white supremacists as personified by the Ku Klux Klan and in other racist myths that elevate the white race as superior. We currently have a president, with his fascist cohorts in Congress, leading in racist threats and comments and with exporting many people who have sought refuge and a better life in the United States.

    In the writing of the Constitution there were long and serious debates about the status of the Negro and the three-fifths compromise made that was clearly based on economic considerations of the time. Cotton was King and a major part of the economy, which succeeded on the plantations thanks to Black slave labor. The rights of women and of indigenous people were ignored.

    The movements and strikes around civil rights and liberties for people of color, for women, and for labor rights led to large protests early on and continue. often related to the right to unionize regarding pay and working conditions, no small thing.

    Paul Robeson singing about Joe Hill, a labor organizer who was accused of murder and executed in 1915 and who is still remembered as an inspiration for labor organizers.

    From the Chicago Haymarket Affair, a protest for an 8-hour workday in Chicago on May 4, 1886, to the organizing of the Hispanic farm workers in California in the 1960s and ‘70s for their right to unions, decent pay, and good working conditions. Today organizing continues to create unions in some professions or demand better pay and working conditions, as strikes have become a method to make demands of employers in the public sector and of corporations.

    Many unions went on strike during and after WWI and after WWII into the ‘20s, ‘30s, and ‘40s and ‘50s, and they have continued along with other forms of Union building. The history of strikes in the U.S. is well-documented in books, articles. songs, and online on the web.

    Judy Collins sings Bread and Roses. The slogan “Bread and Roses” originated in a poem of that name by James Oppenheim, published in American Magazine in December 1911, which attributed it to “the women in the West.” It is commonly associated with the textile strike in Lawrence, Massachusetts during January to March 1912, now often known as the “Bread and Roses strike.” The strike, which united dozens of immigrant communities under the leadership of the Industrial Workers of the World, was led to a large extent by women.

    In the Twin Cities we have an annual labor celebration to remember the strike of 1934 and other labor history. The writer Meridel LeSueur, who participated as a young woman in the 1934 Minneapolis Teamster strike later wrote, “No one can be neutral in the face of bullets ” in one of her short books, I Was Marching. She had joined the women working in the kitchen during the strike. As Minneapolis was a transportation center at the time, the strike attracted national attention. Two protesters were killed in that strike and 67 injured by the police.

    FOOD LINES BY WOMEN'S AUXILARY DURING TEAMSTER STRIKE

    A food line by the women’s auxiliary during the Teamster’s Strike. Photo: International Brotherhood of Teamsters

    Meridel LeSueur was blacklisted during the McCarthy era in the 1950s for her revolutionary writing.

    Collective Bargaining

    Collective bargaining is the process in which working people, through their unions, negotiate contracts with their employers to determine their terms of employment, including pay, benefits, hours, leave, job health and safety policies, ways to balance work and family, and more.

    According to the AFL-CIO, in 1935 the National Labor Relations Act clarified the bargaining rights of most private-sector workers and established collective bargaining as the “policy of the United States.” While it had been used in earlier strikes, it was not a federal law until 1935 during Roosevelt’s first term.

    In 1935, the National Labor Relations Act clarified the bargaining rights of most other private-sector workers and established collective bargaining as the “policy of the United States.” The right to collective bargaining also is recognized by international human rights conventions.

    The freedom to form and join a union is core to the U.N. Universal Declaration on Human Rights and is an “enabling” right—a fundamental right that ensures the ability to protect other rights.

    Eleanor Roosevelt was the Chairperson of the U.N. Commission on Human Rights that wrote the Declaration, and she contributed to its writing. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on December 10, 1948.

    Flash Forward. March/April 2025

    Statement from the AFL-CIO

    Trump and Musk are trying to destroy the right of collective bargaining. It’s on their list of practices that are “unfriendly” to corporate autocratic domination of America.

    March 27, 2025

    AFL-CIO President Liz Shuler issued a statement on a new executive order from the Trump administration stripping collective bargaining and union rights from workers across the federal government:
    Straight out of Project 2025, this executive order is the very definition of union-busting. It strips the fundamental right to unionize and collectively bargain from workers across the federal government at more than 30 agencies. The workers who make sure our food is safe to eat, care for our veterans, protect us from public health emergencies and much more will no longer have a voice on the job or the ability to organize with their coworkers for better conditions at work so they can efficiently provide the services the public relies upon. It’s clear that this order is punishment for unions who are leading the fight against the administration’s illegal actions in court—and a blatant attempt to silence us Trump and Musk have now declared war on collective bargaining, and the AFO-CIO has reacted as they have joined in civil resistance to the daredevil duo’s many undercuttings of the rights of the people, who they are attacking. 

    March, 2025

    The following is a statement that supports the United Farm Workers:

    We are in scary times. As we told you, even before Trump was inaugurated, a huge immigration operation has already begun in rural farm worker areas of Kern County, one of the top five most productive US agricultural counties. Border Patrol traveled 300+ miles from the US-Mexico border to profile the people who work so hard to harvest our food.

    Then Trump was inaugurated. On his first day, he signed frightening Executive Orders including on immigration—which are terrifying farm workers and their families who are already badly shaken up from these raids that appeared to come out of nowhere. We immediately began having “Know Your Rights” sessions for farm workers throughout CA and producing “Know Your Rights” materials that we are distributing and sharing on social media and our website. As we’ve been dealing with this, many of our offices have received hate mail from “Trump’s Coming” with no return address. They say, “Report illegal aliens at schools, at work, at church, at restaurants, in your neighborhood … There is nowhere to hide!” We are not allowing these fear and intimidation tactics to stop us from doing our priority work of letting farm workers know that regardless of their immigration status they have rights. Our organizers are in the fields and communities sharing the resources we’ve been rushing to put together.

    March 28, 2025

    Statement from UAW [United Auto Workers] President Shawn Fain on Attacks on Federal Workers

    Yesterday, President Trump signed an order that tramples on the union rights of more than a million federal workers, stripping them of their ability to negotiate over their working conditions. The 1 million members of the UAW stand with federal workers and their union, AFGE, against the attacks from the Trump administration.

    Update: April 25, 2025

    Summary

    • Order exempting agencies from bargaining blocked pending lawsuit
    • Trump said order was necessary to protect national security
    • Unions claim retaliation for legal challenges to Trump policies

    April 25 (Reuters) – A federal judge on Friday temporarily blocked the administration of President Donald Trump from stripping hundreds of thousands of federal employees of the ability to unionize and collectively bargain over working conditions.

    Senior U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman in Washington, D.C., blocked an executive order Trump issued in March from being implemented pending the outcome of a lawsuit by the National Treasury Employees Union, which represents about 160,000 federal employees.

    AFL-CIO President Applauds Ruling to Restore Federal Workers’ Collective Bargaining Rights

    AFL-CIO President Liz Shuler issued the following statement on a ruling from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in case brought by the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) blocking the Trump administration’s executive order that illegally stripped thousands of federal workers of their collective bargaining rights:

    We commend the court for recognizing the Trump administration’s executive order stripping collective bargaining rights for what it was: illegal, retaliatory union-busting. This was the most significant attack on workers’ rights in history, and if Trump was allowed to do it to federal workers, he would be able to do it to every worker in America, in every workplace and every industry. So this ruling to restore federal workers’ collective bargaining rights and reinstate their existing contracts—even if temporarily while the case continues in court—is an important first step.

    But this fight isn’t over, and it isn’t limited to the courts. Every member of Congress who stands with working people needs to support and vote to pass the Protecting America’s Workforce Act (H.R. 2550), a bill that would reverse this outrageous executive order and restore workers’ union contracts. We won’t rest until this illegal order is struck down once and for all.

    May 16, 2025, Litigation Continues

    A federal appeals court has cleared the way for President Donald Trump‘s executive order to move forward, aiming to curtail collective bargaining rights for hundreds of thousands of federal workers while litigation continues.

    ***

    In a 2-1 decision, a panel of judges in Washington, D.C., ruled that unions representing federal employees lack standing to sue. The majority cited the administration’s assurance that no existing collective bargaining agreements would be terminated during the ongoing legal proceedings.

    Judges Karen Henderson, appointed by former President George H.W. Bush, and Justin Walker, appointed by Trump, supported the ruling; Judge Michelle Childs, appointed by former President Joe Biden, dissented.

    [FDR] changed the relationship between government, business and labor forever.

    —Doris Kerns Goodwin, Ken Burns: The Roosevelts,
    Episode 5, PBS

    Wings of Change

     

    Featured image:

    “Hundreds of people join a protest in downtown Hamilton, Mont., in April supporting the work of federal employees as President Donald Trump oversees efforts to restructure the nation’s government. Federal scientific research and forestry work are part of this small town’s economic bedrock.” Photo: Katheryn Houghton/KFF Health News

    The Unraveling of the New Deal
    END OF PART 2