Category: Sue Ann’s Blog Posts

  • For Dr. Refaat Alareer, by Fatena Abu Mostafa

    Young woman in hijab.
    Your poems journey across the world,
    echo in my mind,
    gather like a family’s embrace.
    GATHER

    A man with beard and glasses with a kite flying in the background.

    Artist: El-Metmari, Creative Commons 3.0

    For Dr. Refaat Alareer 

    If you must die
    then I must live
    to begin where you left off, although
    you have never truly ceased.

    Your poems journey across the world,
    echo in my mind,
    gather like a family’s embrace.
    Your lessons visit me each night,
    an alarm that stirs the soul,
    reminding me to live,
    always, and without fail.

    I must live
    to trace your steps,
    stand where your footprints lie.
    I must read in cafés and cars,
    on bustling streets,
    amidst the market stalls.
    I must read at home and in the university —
    just as you so often did.
    I must meet you in the pages of your books —
    Gaza Writes Back. Gaza Unsilenced.

    No hesitation, I must live
    to cling to the tail of a paper kite
    soaring across the world,
    boundless and free, no walls to hinder,
    no soldier to halt my flight.
    I fly with a pen in my hand as my weapon,
    just as you did.
    On my back I carry a bag
    filled with your poems,
    inked on paper, so true.

    I must soar
    to scatter the fragrance of your verses from the sky.
    Your words descend, colorful blossoms upon the earth.
    One drifts to a child with a paper kite in hand.
    The child glimpses the brilliance you release
    and is struck, as I was,
    with a fever of love for poetry and art —
    caught by it, just as I was.

    I will live
    to answer that little one’s questions,
    to plant the seeds of your verses,
    scatter the nectar of your steps,
    and one day stand before you in the sky.
    I will carry your trust on the wings of a plane,
    deliver your message to all those children
    who will be struck with love for poetry,
    the children who tomorrow will rise,
    successors to Refaat in poetry and letters.

    I must live
    to prosecute those who sentenced your art to death,
    halted its rightful course
    and sought to crush the scent of safety
    your verses breathed into the hearts of your readers.
    I must stand before your words,
    draw hope there —
    a hope I fear losing
    as I lost you.

    I must do my work
    so you may rest in peace —
    you’ve left your legacy in the right hands.
    Your inheritance, divided justly, multiplies
    and even strangers tremble at the weight of its value.

    I will live
    to mourn the tale of the great father,
    to close the notebooks of barren grief,
    to ignite a revolution of true poetry
    and sound the warning of a searing fire,
    to bring to the world the essence of your verses
    and tear down the veil of Zionism,
    as you once desired.

    I can still imagine you there — in the university.
    I must tell you how everyone yearned for your counsel,
    how they hesitated to mourn you.
    The students flocked to the Faculty of Arts
    at the mere mention of your name in the news,
    the weight of your death
    pressed upon them,
    even as they tried not to hear it.

    I must craft endless poems
    from the deepest part of my sea,
    tuck them away in my travel bag
    along with countless messages
    from all who love you.
    I will keep them safe for you
    until we can meet.

    I must live
    to write a new story.

    Read tributes to Dr. Refaat.

    Smiling woman with curly hair and large earrings.
  • The Unraveling of the New Deal, Part 2

    The Unraveling of the New Deal, Part 2

    [FDR] changed the relationship between government, business and labor forever.
    —Doris Kerns Goodwin

    The Unraveling of the New Deal, Part 2

    Link to Part 1

    Minneapolis Union Strike of 2934

    The Minneapolis Teamster’s Strike, 1934

    Labor and Civil Rights and Civil Liberties

    Civil Rights and Civil Liberties are so much a part of Labor History in the United States that while they can also be separate, they are often inextricably tied to Labor in many instances. Immigration is linked to labor history as new immigrants were a labor force often mistreated and therefore became strong labor activists. For Black people the struggle for civil rights was constant and often linked to labor issues.

    Some Immigration History and Now

    Immigration is another area that Trump is active in, attempting to export as many refugees as possible, often in cases where they are actually in the U.S. legally. One example is Mahmoud Khalil, a young student with a green card who was arrested along with his pregnant wife, a U.S. citizen, for his pro-Palestine protests and activities, whose treatment is meant to make other protesters afraid.

    FDR did not single out any particular group of immigrants; he included them all. He recognized the contributions they were making to the U.S. economy and culture. The influx of immigrants was initially primarily from Europe with the exception of the Chinese on the west coast whose labor built the western railroads to connect with the east for rails to cross the continent in the 1860s. 

    They came from Ireland during the potato famine in the mid 1800s, and many as refugees from Europe after WWI, and were followed by those who came just before and after WWII. In more recent times they have come from countries in Asia as a result of the Vietnam War when many Vietnamese and Hmong came to Minnesota.

    The latest waves of immigrants have arrived from the Middle East wars and from Africa. Minnesota now has a large Somali population as many have immigrated due to our wars in their country. Many now are from other African countries as well, where settler colonialism has left them war-torn and the people destitute as multinational corporations from Western multinationals  have robbed them of their natural resources and in effect enslaved their people to do hard labor in their mines.

    Last, but certainly not least, many Spanish- or Portuguese-speaking people from South and Central America have left their countries to come to the United States, some fleeing from extreme dictatorships as political refugees and others from poor countries to better their economic situations. Their presence is evidenced by the need to have many formal government documents translated into Spanish, as well as Somali and other languages.

    “Migrant Mother,” taken by Dorothea Lange in 1936, depicting Florence Owens Thompson, a mother with her children, during the Great Depression. Source: Wikipedia. Photo now is in the Metropolitan Museum of Art.

    Many Hispanic people originally came to work in the large farms that grew fruits and vegetables in California. Some even came to Minnesota to work for Green Giant, resulting in an area on the west side of St. Paul where many settled and stayed.  The fight of these workers to unionize and to demand decent living accommodations and wages is well-documented in film, song and books that describe their struggle; often they feature union organizers Cesar Chavez and Delores Huerta.

    I might also add that the variety of ethnic groups represented as evidenced by the foods available from the many ethnic restaurants here in Minnesota— adding the food of the Black and Native cultures as well—speaks to America being a nation of immigrants, as it has been since the Mayflower.

    Trump’s current attacks on immigrants and immigrant rights are massive as he arrests and deports recent immigrants illegally and with cold-hearted precision. There has been information about the treatment of the deportees in, for example, El Salvador where the accommodations are similar to the Nazi death camps in Germany in WWII, if not worse. He is snatching people off the streets, including students, and sending them to an ICE facility in Louisiana that is reported to be the worst in the country with a reputation for prisoner abuse. How he could possibly care about people is beyond comprehension. The contributions of immigrants to American culture, science, and so on are well-documented in books, articles and on the web.

    Remembering Tammany Hall of legend in New York City, where the cops were all Irish: they had a stranglehold on the government and they were corrupt. I use that as an example because they were white, although sometimes were considered to be of another race to denigrate them. They also helped immigrants, particularly their own. The contributions of Tammany may have been somewhat negative, but they were not all the Irish who came to America during the famine. Men of Irish heritage fought on both the Confederate and the Union sides during the Civil War. Irish contributions to the culture of song and dance are immeasurable, especially when you live across the Mississippi River in Minneapolis and visit sister city St. Paul on St. Patrick’s Day. Or visit, in my case, my Irish heritage friends who have done so much good in this world, not to mention a brother of theirs who was in the state legislature for many years. These Catholic Sisters of St. Joseph were rightfully honored by St. Paul’s History Theater with a play of their own. The Irish have left their positive imprint all over the United States in spite of prejudice because of their  Roman Catholic religion. (“No Irish Need Apply.”)

    Now we have the immigrants from the Middle East, Africa, and those from across the southern border from South and Central America who work in the hotels and often as cleaners in various industries. From Somalia: many Somali men are taxi and truck drivers, at least here in Minnesota. Many are Muslims, and have built a number of mosques in Minneapolis and suburbs.

    The immigration starting basically during my lifetime includes refugees from Vietnam and then the Hmong; it continues to the present day where many new African immigrants work in senior or rehabilitation facilities as nurses or nurses’ aids along with jobs in industry. 

    In other words, they are assimilating. And no, I do not see them so often in the suburbs when I visit. I live in the city, but since George Floyd I see them more often than I used to. What is important is to understand the waves of immigrants who have come to this country and the contributions they have made and that not all white immigrants were good people. But then not all were bad either, and Trump’s attempt to lump all immigrants, especially immigrants of color, into one evil group is in itself an evil, as are his deportations: especially the Hispanics that he is deporting right and left and the pro-Palestinian young college students, as he targets especially those who have taken action against genocide in Gaza.

    In another racist/white supremacist move he has promised to restore all the monuments, the statues, torn down in the time of George Floyd protests that honored the Civil War Confederates in a glorification of both war and racism.

    Of course there is no such thing as one evil race. In the history of the world not only has evil come from all races, including white of course, but also so many of the brilliant people who have made contributions to world culture are from a variety different races; I think particularly of music, poetry and art, but also science, which, because of its nature in work often done away from the public eye, is not acknowledged as often. No one race can claim total superiority.  Or total evil either.

    Trump’s obsession with The Wall that is between the U.S. and Mexico is not MAGA, not Make America Great Again, but MEGA in the sense of huge as he has ordered new walls built and increased border patrols, a militarization of the border between the U.S. and Mexico.

    And he insists on drawing that “color line,” this time against Hispanics: Trump’s father once evicted Woody Guthrie because he couldn’t pay his rent. Woody immortalized it in song.

    I suppose that Old Man Trump knows just how much racial hate
    He stirred up in that bloodpot of human hearts
    When he drawed that color line
    Here at his Beach Haven family project

    Beach Haven ain’t my home!
    No, I just can’t pay this rent!
    My money’s down the drain,
    And my soul is badly bent!
    Beach Haven is Trump’s Tower
    Where no black folks come to roam,
    No, no, Old Man Trump!
    Old Beach Haven ain’t my home!

    But Trump of course is not alone in his efforts to destroy the good that America has done, the American values that so many have fought and died for and others have striven to not just preserve but make active and real in our daily lives, and continue to do so.

    The 2025 program that Trump embraces was created by the Heritage Foundation. Much of a Republican Congress and some Democrats also support what he is doing as he continues to destroy America: There is no other way to describe it. He stands at the titular head of it all with his narcissism and his greed for approval and power, a W.T. Barnum of politics as he centers himself in “the greatest show on earth” as the American Empire crumbles.

    Black People Under FDR

    FDR did more for Black people than any previous president. He had what was called a Black Cabinet that was involved in labor. The Black Cabinet was an unofficial group of African-American advisors to FDR. They ensured that thousands of Black women and men received the training that enabled them to work in the defense industry during World War II. And while helping reverse segregation in the federal workforce, they brought about the first anti-discrimination clauses in government contracts.

    Lynching Law

    Although not related directly to labor, the Roosevelt connection to a lynching law also needs to be mentioned. A law against lynching was controversial at the time, although Eleanor Roosevelt was an avid supporter of creating a federal law against it. She even arranged a meeting between Walter White of the NAACP and FDR. White was an American civil rights activist who led the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) for a quarter of a century, from 1929 until 1955. White directed a broad program of legal challenges to racial segregation and disfranchisement. But because of the southern senators who could block bills that FDR favored, especially Social Security, even though in private he expressed opposition to lynching, it took many years before a federal law took effect. (Ken Burns: The Roosevelts, Episode 5, PBS.) President Biden signed a federal bill making lynching a hate crime on March 29, 2022.

    “The Spirit of the “People”

    The spirit of the New Deal, with its emphasis on the people, a government “of the people, by the people, and for the people,” was not a government for what FDR called the “Economic Royalists,” who held power over the people. Today one name for them is the “ruling elite.” It is true that the U.S. Constitution as originally conceived favored white male landowners. That bias has to some extent been preserved; the white moneyed elite that today takes form in racism as white supremacists as personified by the Ku Klux Klan and in other racist myths that elevate the white race as superior. We currently have a president, with his fascist cohorts in Congress, leading in racist threats and comments and with exporting many people who have sought refuge and a better life in the United States.

    In the writing of the Constitution there were long and serious debates about the status of the Negro and the three-fifths compromise made that was clearly based on economic considerations of the time. Cotton was King and a major part of the economy, which succeeded on the plantations thanks to Black slave labor. The rights of women and of indigenous people were ignored.

    The movements and strikes around civil rights and liberties for people of color, for women, and for labor rights led to large protests early on and continue. often related to the right to unionize regarding pay and working conditions, no small thing.

    Paul Robeson singing about Joe Hill, a labor organizer who was accused of murder and executed in 1915 and who is still remembered as an inspiration for labor organizers.

    From the Chicago Haymarket Affair, a protest for an 8-hour workday in Chicago on May 4, 1886, to the organizing of the Hispanic farm workers in California in the 1960s and ‘70s for their right to unions, decent pay, and good working conditions. Today organizing continues to create unions in some professions or demand better pay and working conditions, as strikes have become a method to make demands of employers in the public sector and of corporations.

    Many unions went on strike during and after WWI and after WWII into the ‘20s, ‘30s, and ‘40s and ‘50s, and they have continued along with other forms of Union building. The history of strikes in the U.S. is well-documented in books, articles. songs, and online on the web.

    Judy Collins sings Bread and Roses. The slogan “Bread and Roses” originated in a poem of that name by James Oppenheim, published in American Magazine in December 1911, which attributed it to “the women in the West.” It is commonly associated with the textile strike in Lawrence, Massachusetts during January to March 1912, now often known as the “Bread and Roses strike.” The strike, which united dozens of immigrant communities under the leadership of the Industrial Workers of the World, was led to a large extent by women.

    In the Twin Cities we have an annual labor celebration to remember the strike of 1934 and other labor history. The writer Meridel LeSueur, who participated as a young woman in the 1934 Minneapolis Teamster strike later wrote, “No one can be neutral in the face of bullets ” in one of her short books, I Was Marching. She had joined the women working in the kitchen during the strike. As Minneapolis was a transportation center at the time, the strike attracted national attention. Two protesters were killed in that strike and 67 injured by the police.

    FOOD LINES BY WOMEN'S AUXILARY DURING TEAMSTER STRIKE

    A food line by the women’s auxiliary during the Teamster’s Strike. Photo: International Brotherhood of Teamsters

    Meridel LeSueur was blacklisted during the McCarthy era in the 1950s for her revolutionary writing.

    Collective Bargaining

    Collective bargaining is the process in which working people, through their unions, negotiate contracts with their employers to determine their terms of employment, including pay, benefits, hours, leave, job health and safety policies, ways to balance work and family, and more.

    According to the AFL-CIO, in 1935 the National Labor Relations Act clarified the bargaining rights of most private-sector workers and established collective bargaining as the “policy of the United States.” While it had been used in earlier strikes, it was not a federal law until 1935 during Roosevelt’s first term.

    In 1935, the National Labor Relations Act clarified the bargaining rights of most other private-sector workers and established collective bargaining as the “policy of the United States.” The right to collective bargaining also is recognized by international human rights conventions.

    The freedom to form and join a union is core to the U.N. Universal Declaration on Human Rights and is an “enabling” right—a fundamental right that ensures the ability to protect other rights.

    Eleanor Roosevelt was the Chairperson of the U.N. Commission on Human Rights that wrote the Declaration, and she contributed to its writing. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) was adopted by the United Nations General Assembly on December 10, 1948.

    Flash Forward. March/April 2025

    Statement from the AFL-CIO

    Trump and Musk are trying to destroy the right of collective bargaining. It’s on their list of practices that are “unfriendly” to corporate autocratic domination of America.

    March 27, 2025

    AFL-CIO President Liz Shuler issued a statement on a new executive order from the Trump administration stripping collective bargaining and union rights from workers across the federal government:
    Straight out of Project 2025, this executive order is the very definition of union-busting. It strips the fundamental right to unionize and collectively bargain from workers across the federal government at more than 30 agencies. The workers who make sure our food is safe to eat, care for our veterans, protect us from public health emergencies and much more will no longer have a voice on the job or the ability to organize with their coworkers for better conditions at work so they can efficiently provide the services the public relies upon. It’s clear that this order is punishment for unions who are leading the fight against the administration’s illegal actions in court—and a blatant attempt to silence us Trump and Musk have now declared war on collective bargaining, and the AFO-CIO has reacted as they have joined in civil resistance to the daredevil duo’s many undercuttings of the rights of the people, who they are attacking. 

    March, 2025

    The following is a statement that supports the United Farm Workers:

    We are in scary times. As we told you, even before Trump was inaugurated, a huge immigration operation has already begun in rural farm worker areas of Kern County, one of the top five most productive US agricultural counties. Border Patrol traveled 300+ miles from the US-Mexico border to profile the people who work so hard to harvest our food.

    Then Trump was inaugurated. On his first day, he signed frightening Executive Orders including on immigration—which are terrifying farm workers and their families who are already badly shaken up from these raids that appeared to come out of nowhere. We immediately began having “Know Your Rights” sessions for farm workers throughout CA and producing “Know Your Rights” materials that we are distributing and sharing on social media and our website. As we’ve been dealing with this, many of our offices have received hate mail from “Trump’s Coming” with no return address. They say, “Report illegal aliens at schools, at work, at church, at restaurants, in your neighborhood … There is nowhere to hide!” We are not allowing these fear and intimidation tactics to stop us from doing our priority work of letting farm workers know that regardless of their immigration status they have rights. Our organizers are in the fields and communities sharing the resources we’ve been rushing to put together.

    March 28, 2025

    Statement from UAW [United Auto Workers] President Shawn Fain on Attacks on Federal Workers

    Yesterday, President Trump signed an order that tramples on the union rights of more than a million federal workers, stripping them of their ability to negotiate over their working conditions. The 1 million members of the UAW stand with federal workers and their union, AFGE, against the attacks from the Trump administration.

    Update: April 25, 2025

    Summary

    • Order exempting agencies from bargaining blocked pending lawsuit
    • Trump said order was necessary to protect national security
    • Unions claim retaliation for legal challenges to Trump policies

    April 25 (Reuters) – A federal judge on Friday temporarily blocked the administration of President Donald Trump from stripping hundreds of thousands of federal employees of the ability to unionize and collectively bargain over working conditions.

    Senior U.S. District Judge Paul Friedman in Washington, D.C., blocked an executive order Trump issued in March from being implemented pending the outcome of a lawsuit by the National Treasury Employees Union, which represents about 160,000 federal employees.

    AFL-CIO President Applauds Ruling to Restore Federal Workers’ Collective Bargaining Rights

    AFL-CIO President Liz Shuler issued the following statement on a ruling from the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia in case brought by the National Treasury Employees Union (NTEU) blocking the Trump administration’s executive order that illegally stripped thousands of federal workers of their collective bargaining rights:

    We commend the court for recognizing the Trump administration’s executive order stripping collective bargaining rights for what it was: illegal, retaliatory union-busting. This was the most significant attack on workers’ rights in history, and if Trump was allowed to do it to federal workers, he would be able to do it to every worker in America, in every workplace and every industry. So this ruling to restore federal workers’ collective bargaining rights and reinstate their existing contracts—even if temporarily while the case continues in court—is an important first step.

    But this fight isn’t over, and it isn’t limited to the courts. Every member of Congress who stands with working people needs to support and vote to pass the Protecting America’s Workforce Act (H.R. 2550), a bill that would reverse this outrageous executive order and restore workers’ union contracts. We won’t rest until this illegal order is struck down once and for all.

    May 16, 2025, Litigation Continues

    A federal appeals court has cleared the way for President Donald Trump‘s executive order to move forward, aiming to curtail collective bargaining rights for hundreds of thousands of federal workers while litigation continues.

    ***

    In a 2-1 decision, a panel of judges in Washington, D.C., ruled that unions representing federal employees lack standing to sue. The majority cited the administration’s assurance that no existing collective bargaining agreements would be terminated during the ongoing legal proceedings.

    Judges Karen Henderson, appointed by former President George H.W. Bush, and Justin Walker, appointed by Trump, supported the ruling; Judge Michelle Childs, appointed by former President Joe Biden, dissented.

    [FDR] changed the relationship between government, business and labor forever.

    —Doris Kerns Goodwin, Ken Burns: The Roosevelts,
    Episode 5, PBS

    Wings of Change

     

    Featured image:

    “Hundreds of people join a protest in downtown Hamilton, Mont., in April supporting the work of federal employees as President Donald Trump oversees efforts to restructure the nation’s government. Federal scientific research and forestry work are part of this small town’s economic bedrock.” Photo: Katheryn Houghton/KFF Health News

    The Unraveling of the New Deal
    END OF PART 2

  • The Unraveling of the New Deal, Part 1

    The Unraveling of the New Deal, Part 1

    These economic royalists complain that we seek to overthrow the institutions of America. What they really complain of is that we seek to take away their power. Our allegiance to American institutions requires the overthrow of this kind of power.

           ─Franklin Delano Roosevelt


    The Unraveling of the New Deal

    By Sue Ann Martinson/
    April 5, 2025

    There is a mysterious cycle in human events. To some generations much is given. Of other generations much is expected. This generation of Americans has a rendezvous with destiny.

    ─ Franklin D. Roosevelt, Acceptance Speech for the Renomination for the Presidency, Philadelphia, Pa.,
    June 27, 1936

    Nowadays we have generation this and generation that, all in categories with their own characteristics. But FDR was referring to collective generations inhabiting the United States at the time. His statement applies now to the current generations of Americans.

    In 1932 when FDR was running for president, he promised if elected a “New Deal” for the American people. At the time Herbert Hoover was president and the nation was in a deep depression caused by the stock market crash of 1929.

    Roosevelt introduced the phrase upon accepting the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination in 1932 before winning the election in a landslide over incumbent Herbert Hoover, whose administration was viewed by many as doing too little to help those affected.

    The following are the words of FDR in his Acceptance Speech for the Renomination for the Presidency on June 27, 1936. The full speech is included at the end of this post.

    For too many of us the political equality we once had won was meaningless in the face of economic inequality. A small group had concentrated into their own hands an almost complete control over other people’s property, other people’s money, other people’s labor—other people’s lives. For too many of us life was no longer free; liberty no longer real; men could no longer follow the pursuit of happiness. [underline emphasis by Wings of Change]

    ***

    These economic royalists complain that we seek to overthrow the institutions of America. What they really complain of is that we seek to take away their power. Our allegiance to American institutions requires the overthrow of this kind of power. In vain they seek to hide behind the Flag and the Constitution. In their blindness they forget what the Flag and the Constitution stand for. Now, as always, they stand for democracy, not tyranny; for freedom, not subjection; and against a dictatorship of mob rule and the over-privileged alike.
    [underlines emphasis by Wings of Change]

    Almost immediately after the Constitution was passed, the Bill of Rights, based on English Common Law, was added, protecting freedom of speech, freedom of the press, the right to assemble and petition, and freedom of religion, all in the First Amendment. The first ten amendments were the originals. New amendments were added to the original Bill of Rights over the years that reflect values and issues of importance to the American people. These rights along with the Constitution itself were the values that FDR championed.

    FDR kept his promise for a New Deal for the American people if they elected him on the heels of the Great Depression that began with the failure of the stock market in 1929. In 1933 during his first term as president he kept his word and initiated bold reforms that became law. Passed with both Republican and Democratic support in Congress, 15 key laws were passed during his first 100 days of office. They were bold reforms that were part of his promised New Deal.

    Among these laws was the Glass-Steagall Act that separated commercial and banking activities; other laws guaranteed bank deposits for depositors (no runs on banks as had previously occurred), loans to homeowners who faced losing their homes because of lack of mortgage payments, and keeping farm prices high by paying farmers not to produce. The Civilian Conservation Corp allowed single men between the ages of 18 and 25 to enlist in work programs to improve America’s public lands, forests, and parks, their room and board paid for, they sent $25 of their $30 pay home to their families.  The National Recovery Act (NRA) set prices and wages: two million employers in 541 industries signed up, promising to keep prices down and wages up. The Social Security Act was signed into law by FDR on August 14, 1935. It established a system of old-age pensions, unemployment insurance, and aid for dependent mothers and children, blind persons, and persons with disabilities, funded by payroll taxes.

    The Bottom Line ─ The Glass-Steagall Act (June 16, 1933)

    The Glass-Steagall Act prevented commercial banks from speculative risk-taking to avoid a financial crisis experienced during the Great Depression. Banks were limited to earning 10 percent of their income from investments. This legislation under FDR was a direct response to the stock market crash of 1929 and the resulting depression.

    The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, under President Clinton, eliminated the Glass-Steagall Act’s restrictions against affiliations between commercial and investment banks in 1999, so unfortunately, the parts of the law that separated investment and speculative commercial interests were repealed, and that repeal is considered to be a cause of the 2008 global recession by many. Some parts of the original Glass-Steagall were maintained, a most important being the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) that still protects deposits and against runs on banks.

    But FDR’s influence was more than creating laws. FDR inspired people. As George Will said as quoted in Ken Burns, Episode 5 of “The Roosevelts” on PBS, he “changed the relationship of the citizen to the central government.“ He instituted the Fireside Chats on the radio, when citizens tuned in weekly to listen. He spoke to them as an equal, building courage and confidence. He established a progressive cabinet, including the first woman cabinet member, Frances Perkins, who oversaw the Works Progress Administration (WPA). Established in 1935, the WPA employed 8.5 million people in building projects and arts initiatives and spent more than $11 million in relief until it was discontinued during WWII.

    Some Background

    Some find it ironic that Roosevelt himself was part of the over-privileged class that was monied, as was Eleanor, his sixth cousin. President Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt was her uncle and FDR’s fifth cousin.

    The original Roosevelt came to this country in the 1600s from the Netherlands, but not under the name Roosevelt which came later. He had two sons and the two sides of the Roosevelts in FDR’S generation were descended respectively from these two sons. Ken Burns goes into detail about the two different families and their activities in his series about the Roosevelts on public television. Some of the information used in this “unraveling” is from this series, which Burns calls The Roosevelts: An Intimate History, as he describes the relationships between the two parts of the family as each produced a president ─ first Theodore “Teddy” Roosevelt on one side and then FDR on the other. He discusses the effects that contracting polio had on FDR’s personal and political life. He also includes the journey of Eleanor Roosevelt from her shyness to becoming a strong person of influence herself and how that affected her relationship with FDR, remembering that she too was a Roosevelt.

    While this essay focuses on FDR’s politics rather than his personal life, the Burns series weaves the two together and is well worth watching. Note that the New Deal and FDR has its critics, while others hail FDR as the greatest president certainly of the 20th century, and even more in the history of America.

    The Present and the New Deal

    Like FDR, President Trump has moved boldly in these early days of the presidency. His first 100 days, always taken as a presidential measure, have been characterized by taking bold action. But the parallel ends there. What is obvious is that his goals are the opposite of the New Deal. Trump seeks to revoke or eviscerate many of the laws and programs that FDR put into place or convert them to private money-making entities that private corporations control. Without FDR and the New Deal there would be no unemployment insurance, no social security, no limit on working hours. no minimum wage, and the laws that regulate money systems, including the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation that protects bank deposits.

    “These economic royalists complain that we seek to overthrow the institutions of America. What they really complain of is that we seek to take away their power,” said FDR. Yet it is these institutions that Trump and his cronies are attempting to destroy precisely because they do put controls on the power of these “economic royalists,” what today we often call the ruling elite. who, as FDR notes, “hide behind the Flag and the Constitution,” as Trump and Co. do by falsely exuding great Patriotism.

    When FDR was inaugurated there were 15,000 million unemployed in America. The New Deal programs he initiated greatly reduced that number by 1935 going into his second term. It’s as if Trump is trying again to reach that number of unemployed through layoffs, releasing thousands of worker, while he and Elon Musk, operating outside of Congress, raid our institutions with layoffs and cutbacks in funding, all the while giving perks via tax cuts and investments to corporations that have raised prices and that continue to destroy the environment and contribute to the current climate crisis as well as increasing the already bloated military budget by taking money from social programs (never from corporations, which the government continues to fund.

    Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE)

    Trump and his cohorts, especially Elon Musk, have created the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). It was not created by Congress but by an executive order of Trump’s. Although DOGE is supposedly managed by the bipartisan DOGE Caucus whose purpose is “pave the way for the House of Representatives to streamline government operations and to save taxpayer money,” they are dismantling and cutting off funding for most programs that support ordinary citizens in need as well as some foreign programs like USAid.

    Despite its full name, DOGE is not an official government department, which would have had to be established by an act of Congress. Instead it came into being through one of Trump’s presidential executive orders, and operates as an advisory body with at least four employees dedicated to each government agency.

    Trump and Musk are conducting a hell-bent crusade against as many social programs as possible. While their actions may not directly be the repeal of all the same laws that were passed by Congress under FDR’s presidency, with so many people laid off it is as if Trump and his cronies are trying to match the 15 million people who were unemployed when FDR officially became president in 1933, along with the millions of immigrants Trump has deported or plans to deport, some of whom are American citizens or hold green cards.

    Musk and Trump, under the auspices of DOGE, are slashing programs that benefit the citizens of America with broad strokes. What they call a campaign against fraud in reality is a gutting of social programs that benefit ordinary citizens. At the same time Trump continues more than excessive military spending by funding foreign wars ─ most obviously the Ukraine War and the continuing genocide against the people of Palestine/Gaza being criminally perpetrated by Israel─ as well as maintaining an excessive and very expensive worldwide military network. At the same time they are gutting the Environmental Protective Agency (EPA) and increasing rather than curtailing the use of fossil fuels, a CO2 pollutant that is a major cause of the Climate Crisis that puts the whole planet at risk.

    The Trump administration and Trump himself pretend and encourage their followers to pretend that there is no relationship between the climate crisis and the use of fossil fuels, yet the Union of Concerned Scientists and other responsible and realistic academics as well as ordinary people have shown us otherwise with their analyses and activism alike. And the U.S. military continues to be the a major polluter in the world with its use of fossil fuels that release CO2 and methane gas into the atmosphere as well as by the pollution of water, especially by what are called PFAS pollutants, with the 1000 plus military bases and military installations worldwide.

    In addition Trump is acting in true autocratic manner in attempting to shut down free speech in the colleges where pro-Palestine students are attempting to exercise the right of free speech. This ban extends to all media by his demands that no critical articles be written about him and there be no critiques of his platform and actions. In addition, the Trump administration’s policies result in the threatening of academic freedom of college and university faculty members. His actions mimic Hitler’s seeing that Jewish professors and anyone opposed to him were fired from colleges and universities and punishing students who opposed his policies, such as the White Rose student group who were murdered by Hitler for distributing pamphlets against him. The book bans that are being legislated in many states are also an attack on free speech and approximate the book burnings under Hitler.

    As usual, Trump is pursuing his policy of hate and hyper-militarism for specious  reasons that attack the most basic American values such as free speech and the peoples’ right to assemble along with the right to petition the Government for a redress of grievances; they rationalize this Constitutional crisis with all the geopolitical ins and outs and machinations and excuses they can create. Congress keeps pouring money into weapons and then sending them to Ukraine for continued war and to Israel for the continued genocide against the people of Palestine, making sure the war industry is well-funded and much of the profits are returned to members of Congress for their election campaigns and personal use, Congress appears to have been brain-washed; when interviewed by Medea Benjamin and other Code Pink members in its halls in response to their questions, they shift all blame back to Hamas when it is the U.S. that is guilty of supporting Israel’s continuing apartheid and oppression of Palestine since 1948. It is the U.S. that keeps shipping weapons and money to Israel so they can continue with the genocide. Any attempts at forming a ceasefire Trump’s part have failed.

    End of Part 1, The Unraveling of the New Deal

    ++++++++++++++++++++

    FDR Acceptance Speech for the Renomination for Presidency on June 27, 1936. Full address:

    Senator Robinson, Members of the Democratic Convention, my friends:

    Here, and in every community throughout the land, we are met at a time of great moment to the future of the Nation. It is an occasion to be dedicated to the simple and sincere expression of an attitude toward problems, the determination of which will profoundly affect America.

    I come not only as a leader of a party, not only as a candidate for high office, but as one upon whom many critical hours have imposed and still impose a grave responsibility.

    For the sympathy, help and confidence with which Americans have sustained me in my task I am grateful. For their loyalty I salute the members of our great party, in and out of political life in every part of the Union. I salute those of other parties, especially those in the Congress of the United States who on so many occasions have put partisanship aside. I thank the Governors of the several States, their Legislatures, their State and local officials who participated unselfishly and regardless of party in our efforts to achieve recovery and destroy abuses. Above all I thank the millions of Americans who have borne disaster bravely and have dared to smile through the storm.

    America will not forget these recent years, will not forget that the rescue was not a mere party task. It was the concern of all of us. In our strength we rose together, rallied our energies together, applied the old rules of common sense, and together survived.

    In those days we feared fear. That was why we fought fear. And today, my friends, we have won against the most dangerous of our foes. We have conquered fear.

    But I cannot, with candor, tell you that all is well with the world. Clouds of suspicion, tides of ill-will and intolerance gather darkly in many places. In our own land we enjoy indeed a fullness of life greater than that of most Nations. But the rush of modern civilization itself has raised for us new difficulties, new problems which must be solved if we are to preserve to the United States the political and economic freedom for which Washington and Jefferson planned and fought.

    Philadelphia is a good city in which to write American history. This is fitting ground on which to reaffirm the faith of our fathers; to pledge ourselves to restore to the people a wider freedom; to give to 1936 as the founders gave to 1776—an American way of life.

    That very word freedom, in itself and of necessity, suggests freedom from some restraining power. In 1776 we sought freedom from the tyranny of a political autocracy—from the eighteenth century royalists who held special privileges from the crown. It was to perpetuate their privilege that they governed without the consent of the governed; that they denied the right of free assembly and free speech; that they restricted the worship of God; that they put the average man’s property and the average man’s life in pawn to the mercenaries of dynastic power; that they regimented the people.

    And so it was to win freedom from the tyranny of political autocracy that the American Revolution was fought. That victory gave the business of governing into the hands of the average man, who won the right with his neighbors to make and order his own destiny through his own Government. Political tyranny was wiped out at Philadelphia on July 4, 1776.

    Since that struggle, however, man’s inventive genius released new forces in our land which reordered the lives of our people.. The age of machinery, of railroads; of steam and electricity; the telegraph and the radio; mass production, mass distribution—all of these combined to bring forward a new civilization and with it a new problem for those who sought to remain free.

    For out of this modern civilization economic royalists carved new dynasties. New kingdoms were built upon concentration of control over material things. Through new uses of corporations, banks and securities, new machinery of industry and agriculture, of labor and capital—all undreamed of by the fathers—the whole structure of modern life was impressed into this royal service.

    There was no place among this royalty for our many thousands of small business men and merchants who sought to make a worthy use of the American system of initiative and profit. They were no more free than the worker or the farmer. Even honest and progressive-minded men of wealth, aware of their obligation to their generation, could never know just where they fitted into this dynastic scheme of things.

    It was natural and perhaps human that the privileged princes of these new economic dynasties, thirsting for power, reached out for control over Government itself. They created a new despotism and wrapped it in the robes of legal sanction. In its service new mercenaries sought to regiment the people, their labor, and their property. And as a result the average man once more confronts the problem that faced the Minute Man.

    The hours men and women worked, the wages they received, the conditions of their labor—these had passed beyond the control of the people, and were imposed by this new industrial dictatorship. The savings of the average family, the capital of the small business man, the investments set aside for old age—other people’s money—these were tools which the new economic royalty used to dig itself in.

    Those who tilled the soil no longer reaped the rewards which were their right. The small measure of their gains was decreed by men in distant cities.

    Throughout the Nation, opportunity was limited by monopoly. Individual initiative was crushed in the cogs of a great machine. The field open for free business was more and more restricted. Private enterprise, indeed, became too private. It became privileged enterprise, not free enterprise.

    An old English judge once said: “Necessitous men are not free men.” Liberty requires opportunity to make a living—a living decent according to the standard of the time, a living which gives man not only enough to live by, but something to live for.

    For too many of us the political equality we once had won was meaningless in the face of economic inequality. A small group had concentrated into their own hands an almost complete control over other people’s property, other people’s money, other people’s labor—other people’s lives. For too many of us life was no longer free; liberty no longer real; men could no longer follow the pursuit of happiness.

    Against economic tyranny such as this, the American citizen could appeal only to the organized power of Government. The collapse of 1929 showed up the despotism for what it was. The election of 1932 was the people’s mandate to end it. Under that mandate it is being ended.

    The royalists of the economic order have conceded that political freedom was the business of the Government, but they have maintained that economic slavery was nobody’s business. They granted that the Government could protect the citizen in his right to vote, but they denied that the Government could do anything to protect the citizen in his right to work and his right to live.

    Today we stand committed to the proposition that freedom is no half-and-half affair. If the average citizen is guaranteed equal opportunity in the polling place, he must have equal opportunity in the market place.

    These economic royalists complain that we seek to overthrow the institutions of America. What they really complain of is that we seek to take away their power. Our allegiance to American institutions requires the overthrow of this kind of power. In vain they seek to hide behind the Flag and the Constitution. In their blindness they forget what the Flag and the Constitution stand for. Now, as always, they stand for democracy, not tyranny; for freedom, not subjection; and against a dictatorship by mob rule and the over-privileged alike.

    The brave and clear platform adopted by this Convention, to which I heartily subscribe, sets forth that Government in a modern civilization has certain inescapable obligations to its citizens, among which are protection of the family and the home, the establishment of a democracy of opportunity, and aid to those overtaken by disaster.

    But the resolute enemy within our gates is ever ready to beat down our words unless in greater courage we will fight for them.

    For more than three years we have fought for them. This Convention, in every word and deed, has pledged that that fight will go on.

    The defeats and victories of these years have given to us as a people a new understanding of our Government and of ourselves. Never since the early days of the New England town meeting have the affairs of Government been so widely discussed and so clearly appreciated. It has been brought home to us that the only effective guide for the safety of this most worldly of worlds, the greatest guide of all, is moral principle.

    We do not see faith, hope and charity as unattainable ideals, but we use them as stout supports of a Nation fighting the fight for freedom in a modern civilization.

    Faith— in the soundness of democracy in the midst of dictatorships.

    Hope—renewed because we know so well the progress we have made.

    Charity— in the true spirit of that grand old word. For charity literally translated from the original means love, the love that understands, that does not merely share the wealth of the giver, but in true sympathy and wisdom helps men to help themselves.

    We seek not merely to make Government a mechanical implement, but to give it the vibrant personal character that is the very embodiment of human charity.

    We are poor indeed if this Nation cannot afford to lift from every recess of American life the dread fear of the unemployed that they are not needed in the world. We cannot afford to accumulate a deficit in the books of human fortitude.

    In the place of the palace of privilege we seek to build a temple out of faith and hope and charity.

    It is a sobering thing, my friends, to be a servant of this great cause. We try in our daily work to remember that the cause belongs not to us, but to the people. The standard is not in the hands of you and me alone. It is carried by America. We seek daily to profit from experience, to learn to do better as our task proceeds.

    Governments can err, Presidents do make mistakes, but the immortal Dante tells us that divine justice weighs the sins of the cold-blooded and the sins of the warm-hearted in different scales.

    Better the occasional faults of a Government that lives in a spirit of charity than the consistent omissions of a Government frozen in the ice of its own indifference.

    There is a mysterious cycle in human events. To some generations much is given. Of other generations much is expected. This generation of Americans has a rendezvous with destiny.

    In this world of ours in other lands, there are some people, who, in times past, have lived and fought for freedom, and seem to have grown too weary to carry on the fight. They have sold their heritage of freedom for the illusion of a living. They have yielded their democracy.

    I believe in my heart that only our success can stir their ancient hope. They begin to know that here in America we are waging a great and successful war. It is not alone a war against want and destitution and economic demoralization. It is more than that; it is a war for the survival of democracy. We are fighting to save a great and precious form of government for ourselves and for the world.

    I accept the commission you have tendered me. I join with you. I am enlisted for the duration of the war.

    Franklin D. Roosevelt, Acceptance Speech for the Renomination for the Presidency, Philadelphia, Pa. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/node/208917

    Wings of Change

     

    Wings of Change

     

    END OF PART 1

  • Welcome to Wings of Change

    Welcome to Wings of Change

    These are perilous times, and we have much work to do. And it is wonderful to see online how much work is being done by activists locally, around the country, and around the world.

    Welcome to Wings of Change. On this my new website and blog I will still be posting some articles just as I did on Rise Up Times, with the addition of a personal blog. I am so glad to have a website again.

    Please subscribe (and if you can donate) to WingsofChange.me.

    Rise Up Times has been archived but you can still read it. Just go to riseuptimes.org and search by date from the sidebar. These are still Rise Up Times, and we continue to rise up! And Rise Up Times is still on social media: Twitter (X), Facebook, Pinterest, Tumbler, Linked In, and under my name, Sue Ann Martinson, on my personal Facebook page. And also now on Instagram and Tik Tok.

    Let Freedom Ring! The Liberty Bell may be cracked but “that’s how the light gets in” says Leonard Cohen. Meanwhile “ring the bells that still can ring” with continued action everywhere in every possible nonviolent way as we continue to plant the seeds of justice and peace. An old saying is  “every time a bell rings an angel gets its wings.” Well, every time you take an action for justice and peace you use your Wings of Change.

    With peace and justice for all,

    Sue Ann

    WINGS OF CHANGE

     

    Wings of Change

     

    Seeds of Resistance art by Ricardo Levins Morales:  rlmartstudio.com. Posters and much more.

    Need a T-shirt or a bumper sticker? Don’t forget Northern Sun (northernsun.com) for custom orders and other peace and justice items.